Phil Spencer, an Xbox executive at Microsoft, said the Xbox Live platform is not designed for free speech. The comments were made in a recent interview, where Spencer was asked about the game’s connection to the controversial state of US politics.
Spencer sits on Microsoft’s leadership team as Executive Vice President of Games, leading the Xbox brand and overseeing its global creative teams. He has been in the role since 2017, but has a long history with Microsoft, first joining the company as an intern in the late 1980s. Gaming fans can recognize him from his regular appearances at Microsoft’s E3 conferences. since 2010, as well as other gaming events such as The Game Awards.
The comments on free speech are part of an interview with The New York Times, conducted by Kara Swisher, who asked Spencer if there was a relationship between gambling and division in American politics. Swisher cited Steve Bannon’s earlier comments on the exploitation of gaming communities as political tools, citing a comment by Bannon about the Gamergate controversy. Spencer categorically rejected the idea that Xbox Live was designed to facilitate political discourse, arguing that the service is primarily designed for gaming-related activities.
“One of the things we have said about our social network is that we are not a free speech platform. We are a platform around interactive entertainment and video games … We are not here to allow a conversation to take place on our platform. “
Spencer’s views are consistent with previous comments he made about Microsoft’s role in facilitating Xbox Live. His efforts date back to 2019, when he led an initiative to redefine Microsoft’s community guidelines to end online harassment. They focused on hatred, sexual harassment and discrimination, but allowed jokes and “nonsense”, assuming it was not of an abusive nature. At the time, Spencer also strongly rejected the idea that Xbox Live was a “platform for free speech,” adding that he wanted Xbox’s motives to be clear when it comes to developing its platform. -community form.
Some argue that online platforms (especially those owned by U.S. entities) should uphold the First Amendment right to free speech, while others argue that content moderation is fundamental to online communities, who are constantly vulnerable to hate speech and abuse from anonymous bad actors. For Xbox Live, which limits its reach to gaming-related activities, the issue may be less complex than for services like Twitter and Facebook. However, the issue of effective content moderation remains a challenge, and Spencer does not have all the answers.
“I think we all have a long way to go. You could tell me that’s a lame answer. It’s okay,” Spencer said when asked about the effectiveness of the moderation in player communities. Spencer isn’t the only leading Xbox figure to speak out publicly for better moderation. In December, Xbox co-creator Seamus Blackley recently spoke out against toxic gamer behavior after a video was released showing a female gamer being verbally harassed in Infinite halo. Blackley described the incident as not being “the future of Xbox Live we envisioned” and called on Microsoft and the gaming community to do more to address the issues.
The balance between freedom and player protection is not an easy task to find, but Microsoft has at least taken a strong stand. For many gamers, Xbox’s continued commitment to moderating communities and providing a gaming-centric platform is an advancement of sorts, although there is still a long way to go.
MORE: Should Microsoft Ditch Xbox Games with Gold in 2022?
While exploring the wilds of the Realm of Hyrule, a player discovers a little-known detail about how the ogre-like Hinox attacks in Breath of the Wild.
About the Author